| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
1. Sticky:CSM Guest Blog: "Reasonable Things" Voting Phase - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alex Medvedov: 15, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 53, 74, 85
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2013.08.05 12:02:00
|
2. "assault" guns / "Rapid light guns" - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Verity Sovereign wrote: Alex Medvedov wrote: You seem to forgeting that RMLs are based on frigate sized Missile Launchers - that means on long range weapon system. Theres nothing like the cruiser sized rocket launchers. *cough* Heavy As...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2013.01.30 12:55:00
|
3. "assault" guns / "Rapid light guns" - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Drake Doe wrote: Since the RLMs are pretty much fine right now I can't see a reason that a slightly stronger version of the highest power frigate weapons (200mm autos, neutrons, etc.) Would be overkill against small ships as long as it is prope...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2013.01.29 18:25:00
|
4. Solo - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Makavelia wrote: I don't know why peple are so against this kinde idea..... You are certainly right that beeing part of a blob fleet does not teach the pilot anything. But you are wrong on the other fronts. 1) Solo PVP is not dead, but its ...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2013.01.28 14:56:00
|
5. Dont change the 2/10 plexes! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
As the long time frigate pilot and frequent 2/10 plex visitor I would like to add a few words to this topic. First the idea of simple accelaration gates which was proposed by CCP will not work, as was pointed out already, because there will be n...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2013.01.16 12:59:00
|
6. 1/10 and 2/10 static DED complexes have been moved to the exploration system - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Sylvous wrote: This change from the new Dec 4th patch has some serious implications to the lowsec 1v1 and small gang lifestyles in some regions, and being a resident of this community I'd like to point out an unfortunate side effect of this cha...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.12.01 22:26:00
|
7. Dont change the 2/10 plexes! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I support keeping them as they are - those plexes are one of not many things which are supporting solo/small gang PVP in lowsec!
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.12.01 22:21:00
|
8. [VIDEO] The Molden Heathen GÇô Solo Frigate PVP - in My EVE [original thread]
Really nice Rifter fights, mate! Mine criticism is the same as Laktos-¦ - fights could have been more accelerated and no ECM should have been used:) On the ECM note - ECM, racial or not is certainly not a violation of any 1v1. Its ofc pretty la...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.02.15 15:19:00
|
9. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Zircon Dasher wrote: I am pretty sure that if you blow up 15km from a cruiser the damage you inflicted is much smaller than the damage you *would* have inflicted if you had gotten under 4km on that cruiser. And what about neuts, ECMs, webs...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.01.18 16:36:00
|
10. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hirana Yoshida wrote: Alex Medvedov wrote: Their role already exists and it is to deal damage.... Then why even discuss the merits of a MWD sig reduction as it does not facilitate said role and tracking also does nothing for damage except ...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.01.18 16:33:00
|
11. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Zircon Dasher wrote: What advantage does a Tornado/oracle/talos/naga have over..... Except in this case it would be compounded. Those are ships of the same class, AFs are still frigates - they would not have option of fitting Cruiser sized ...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.01.18 16:12:00
|
12. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hirana Yoshida wrote: My final take; Back to drawing-board and don't even mention any sort of bonus before this pesky question has been answered: What is their role? Nope, you are wrong about that. The least thing AFs need is to further l...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.01.18 15:56:00
|
13. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
@ Zarnak I dont think many oppose the changes for the sake of conservatism or just fear of change. I believe problem is somewhere else. Many players keep demanding some sort of role for AFs. In my opinion thats complete nonsense - the poupose o...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.01.18 00:15:00
|
14. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Takeshi Yamato wrote: If all else fails, it's always possible to give AFs a unique role that no other ship can fill. Some possibilities: 1) Armor Breaker and Shield Breaker modules: reduce the target's armor and shield resistances by a small ...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.01.16 17:44:00
|
15. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
AFs have one role already - they excel as low-sec pirate vessels, so keep that in mind when proposing some ingenious "fix all role bonuses". In my opinion, no role bonus is needed and if you really insist on having one, it should be something whic...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.01.16 17:07:00
|
16. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Kemhotep wrote: Minmatar Online , when will this **** end? - Kem. And your findings are based on what exactly? Although the Wolf would be damn good ship after the changes, it still lacks a web and therefore Enyo, Vengeance, Hawk, Harpy...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.01.14 12:30:00
|
17. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
After extensive testing of a Hawk against various AFs Prom was piloting I have to admit my concerns were largely disposed. Hawk will indeed be very powerful AF, but as Prom have proved to me, its far from being unbeatable. I have to admit as wel...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.01.13 18:13:00
|
18. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Prometheus Exenthal wrote: I wasn't using Hobgoblins.. I was using Warriors & Acolytes, and Anja wasn't shooting kinetic at me Ok just try that setup and tell me what is able to get you...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.01.13 15:51:00
|
19. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Anja Talis wrote: Now you say this, but have you actually tested it? I was dueling Prom in the "uberwtfdualwebmsehawk" fit vs his Ishkur. I had him nice and contained at about 9k. He popped out his Hobgoblin IIs, I moved webs over on to the d...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.01.13 15:45:00
|
20. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
DARKSTAR POWNYOUALL wrote: Alex Medvedov wrote: Yes and when you are at it , give my Jag 5th mid as well, +5 pg and the 5th high slot, because i dont want to be killed by Wolves and Thrashers anymore... Do you think it will have any influe...
- by Alex Medvedov - at 2012.01.12 14:42:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |